Record how the mandate is classified
Document why you classify a mandate as relevant under anti-money laundering law, which information supports the assessment and who reviewed it. Keep open questions and differing assessments traceable.
Anti-money laundering for your law firm.
Keep track of missing documents and open checks. Normagon brings client information, evidence and decisions together in a protected case file, even when responsibility changes.
Explore the law firm solutionA shared view of your AML documentation.
Document parties and beneficial owners
Record individuals, companies, representation arrangements and information about ownership and control. Keep statements, sources and review results separate and traceable.
Document checks and reasons for decisions
Assign risk assessments and due diligence checks to the relevant mandate. Record missing documents, additional checks and the reasons for your decisions. Keep a separate professional review identifiable.
Work with sensitive case files securely
Restrict access to explicitly authorised people. Keep observations, professional decisions and protected evidence together; general administrative rights do not replace case-specific authorisation.
For law firms handling mandates subject to AML obligations.
For responsible lawyers, anti-money laundering officers and staff working together on relevant matters. In particular, real estate and corporate transactions require information, ownership structures and assessments to fit together. Normagon provides a shared working basis with controlled access.
Questions from law firms
Is every legal mandate subject to AML obligations?
No. For lawyers, obliged-entity status depends on the activities listed in section 2(1), no. 10 of the German Money Laundering Act (GwG). The assessment must fit the specific mandate. Normagon provides a place to record that professional decision and its reasons.
How does the firm-wide risk analysis differ from a mandate-specific risk assessment?
The firm-wide risk analysis considers the risks of the firm’s activities as a whole. The mandate-specific assessment concerns an individual case and appropriate measures. The two levels are distinct; assessing one case does not replace the overall analysis.
Does Normagon replace professional review?
The software supports organisation and documentation. The responsible professionals decide which evidence is needed, how information is verified and which further steps are appropriate. We discuss your existing identification and verification procedures when considering how you would use Normagon.
Fewer follow-up questions about the next case.
Discover how Normagon brings open checks, responsible people and documented decisions together for your law firm.